Jump to content

Talk:Falklands War

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateFalklands War is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 19, 2004Refreshing brilliant proseNot kept
November 20, 2004Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 12, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 19, 2004, March 19, 2005, April 2, 2007, June 14, 2008, June 14, 2010, June 14, 2011, and June 14, 2014.
Current status: Former featured article candidate


Date

[edit]

Presently it says this:

Date 2 April – 14 June 1982

(2 months, 1 week and 5 days)

Location Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
Result British victory

According to the House of Lords libraryit ended in a ceasefire,and according to oxford dictionary a ceasefire is only a Temporary suspension of hostilities,relations were normalised on July 14 1999 between the 2 countries wich was made possible by delegations on 19 October 1989 and 15 February 1990, UnsungHistory (talk) 18:22, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question: is "defuze" a correct spelling?

[edit]

in the first paragraph of the section, "Air Attacks", it says:

"In the landing zone, the limitations of the British ships' anti-aircraft defences were demonstrated in the sinking of HMS Ardent on 21 May which was hit by nine bombs,[126] and HMS Antelope on 24 May when attempts to defuze unexploded bombs failed.[127] Out at sea with the carrier battle group, MV Atlantic Conveyor...."

Is this deliberate? Google seems to recognize this spelling of the word "defuse", but Ive never heard of it. INSANITYISAVIRTUE (talk) 01:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this has come up before although I can't remember where. I too think it odd and without a good reason not to I would use defuse not defuze. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 04:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there so much disparity between the Spanish text and the English text?

[edit]

It would be a good idea to rewrite the given information about this conflict as objective and factional as possible, correcting both texts English and Spanish. In order to avoid confusion and misinformation to readers. 64.140.144.49 (talk) 06:50, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The English and Spanish language Wikipedias are separate, and don't need to agree with each other. The Spanish language Wikipedia's coverage of the Falklands War is likely dominated by Argentines. The general consensus in the literature is that Argentine sources need to be used with care as they often contain myths. Many English language sources going back to the 1980s have drawn on interviews with Argentine veterans and consulted Spanish language sources. I think that it's fair to say that there aren't any definitive histories of the war at present though. Nick-D (talk) 10:19, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What just happened

[edit]

I came into the article, and I saw a slight error in starting a sentence: a paragraph started with space, which caused text to be pixelated and encased inside a box. I corrected it, but then I realized that the entire lede was written as if it were a history of the archipelago, instead of an introduction to a page describing a war. I can't find a way to revert it back to a previous edit, can somebody look into it, please? GabMen20 (talk) 13:30, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As a result of this edit] it seems.Nigel Ish (talk) 13:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]